Being a writer is much more than just sitting and writing.
It is knowing that you need to invest, disclose, unfold in two, but mainly have psychological
Every day we see authors complaining of low notes in their books, something that drives away MANY readers, but creates other questions: This plaintiff you're complaining about published it thinking everyone would like it? Many do not like the most classic and famous names of literature, why should everyone like the book of an unknown/initiant/anyone? Account does not close
They get annoyed with 1
Those who publish must understand that they are subject to criticism, especially if they are wrong about something. Do not be deluded by assessments all 5. and just praising — something has. Books of honest authors always have criticisms, be it 3
Critics will come from readers, influencers, professionals, amateurs, friends, family members... even those who don't even know what the book in question is.
An author needs maturity to deal with all this.
Authors have received criticism from their own minds since they began writing. They receive criticism from professionals who are trying to help (many do not even go through the lawsuits for fear of what they will hear and publish anyway, it is sad)
But pointing errors in a national book DO NOT MEAN to give hater, to be laceration, mafia of 1
An author, in my opinion, should reach the literary market aware that not everyone will like his book, especially those who paid to read and are not divulging. There are reports and evidence of people who stopped evaluating Amazon or Skoob for having received attacks. Our readers are getting afraid to give their personal opinion, which should be a right — and this IT'S NOT RIGHT.
Valuing national literature is not treating as "milk coffee" and just giving praise. Valuing means evaluating, buying, disclosing, and giving sincere opinion — whether positive or negative. Valuing is not deceiving or applauding bad narratives. Authors, regardless of whether they are national, gringo, publishers or independent, must offer quality to readers, and to value it means just recognizing this. There are publishers publishing horrible, independent books too — and neither should be applauded for poor quality.
At the same time good things are being published and should be valued by merit
People should be free to criticize what they do not like, especially in the literary environment, which is formed by opinions.
Criticisms should not only be made by professionals — readers also have the right to express their opinions, positive or negative — and authors must accept.
Not everyone will judge with a critical sense, like or be polite, but getting your head warmed up with it is much more damaging to mental health.
